Re: nonsensical conversations over the theories of meaning of existence and other such stuf that in no way could actually be the case and would only b
ok here is my theory and i was thinking about this so here it goes
what if there really is a god and he created the big bang think about it he could have made the big bang and
it could have taken 7 days for the planets to form and grow life on and the very first neanderthals that were found by old time scientist dubbed them adam and eve
That's close to the theory I formulated when I was in 1st year high school (to which I was labeled as an atheist and the devil's son).
I theorized that the Bible did not describe the events in Genesis literally and was to an extent completely figurative. However, I realized later that it was presented in the terms of a divine being. My realization was as follows(same thought, different words as my vocabulary improved through the years)
We cannot deny that the Big Bang(coupled with the Expansion theory) is the closest and most plausible creation theory science can currently assume, however, this does not mean that the occurrence only lasted an instance.
1. The Big Bang could not have occurred on it's own. My personal theory on possibility is that 'anything and everything can happen provided that all necessary conditions are met'. In this sense I assumed that in order for the Big Bang to occur, a force beyond the original contents of the universe in its primordial state caused it to enact the big bang.
2. The universe was not and could not be created in a matter of days, that is on our concept of time. To a supernatural being, a day could mean an eon for us. However I will state here that the events mentioned in Genesis referred to events that formed the universe not just earth.
If we assume that the emptiness of space is given, the 'first day' references the creation of light and in my belief refers to the 'dark period' of the universe. This means it was a period that encompassed a great number of years necessary to bring forth stars. The 'second' to 'fourth' days more likely refer to the formation of the galaxies and planets or rather the universe's 'development period', the separation of water may refer to the gathering of cosmic dust to form nebulae and galaxies while the formation of the earth and moon may refer to the formation of planets and their satellites. The 'fifth' and 'sixth' days refers to the 'evolutionary period' of the universe, (I am assuming that there is life on other planets, therefore this period may differ from planet to planet) the Bible itself noted that fish(scientifically sea creatures) appeared first, and may be inferred that birds(dinosaurs, since their direct descendants are our current birds) followed. The land creatures referred to in the 'sixth' day more accurately refers to our current concept of animals, most of which are prehistoric creatures that our ancestors(homo sp) interacted with. Basing on fossils and other scientific findings, humans appeared latest among the creatures and as such coincides to what is described in Genesis. The 'seventh' day or the Sabbath day refers to our current period, what I call the 'enlightenment period' of the universe, a time in which knowledge of the unknown is sought for.
Eden most likely refers to Pangea before it separated. Adam and Eve most likely means 'man and woman' and referred to the first
homo sp.. It may be inferred that their discovery of the use of fire coincided with the separation of the mega-continent and as such referred to in Genesis as the eating of the forbidden fruit and its consequential punishment.
What baffles me is how did anyone from that period know of such events? I believe that the some parts of the Bible were accounts of what has really transpired written in simply the words of the people who wrote them, but still the events of the creation is impossible to have been known by anyone.
PS this is only my theory born from once being a devout Catholic turning into an agnostic so don't bash me for it.
